THIS BLOG WILL CONSIST OF STORIES AND VIEWS AND OPINIONS OF THE AUTHOR OF THIS BLOG
Sunday, September 7, 2014
Truth on collapse of Oregon health insurance exchange
Here is the truth in the Oregon Health Insurance exchange. Bureaucrats, State Legislature, Governor Kitzhaber's office , Insurance Commissioner and Oregon Health Authority not Oracle corporation. Oracle only provided technical support and web page support. They had fulfilled this. Politicians and bureaucrats did not provide enough servers to handle the traffic of individuals to comply with federal mandate which took a supreme court ruling to do on June 2012. Federal role out on Halloween 2013 by Federal Health and Human Services of the federal exchange was also a slow disaster at first by former secretary Kathleen Sebellius only chosen due to been from Barack Obama's mothers home state of Kansas. Bureaucracy caused collapse not web hardware and server company Oracle in Boise they also have centers in Eastern Oregon. Oracle had its Oregon employees working on the Cover Oregon to help the bureaucrats monitoring the site.
Each state voters should decide what marriage should regardless of so called equality
Recently federal judges have overstepped there bounds in most states have defined marriage as one man and one woman. Only one ban in Louisiana escape this overstepping of federal judge who was smart it might be the waters of the bayou or that if Phil Robertson the patriotic of Duck Dynasty not sure. This marriage equality needs to do the right way like in my home state and ask the voters to change the law and voters said yes in 2012. I disagree with this the voters of Washington, Colorado and other states have spoken said yes. The same sex marriage needs to respect that they do not need to go to court and covert their agenda America is not a dictatorship ruled by people in Geneva Tabs like in British Empire. In 1775 we America told the king to go to hell. Let's rule by judge this is wrong for this so called marriage equality movement. Voters say no it means no. We need to hopefully not make this a constitution amendment or federal law that handicaps a federal judge from ruling on state policy decisions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)